Differences in energy expenditure between high- and low-volume training

Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(4):422-30. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2011.635707. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

Abstract

Several studies have examined energy expenditure in various sports but there is a lack of research on the contribution of exercise and habitual activity during different training periods. This study examined changes in total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) and its components during high- and low-volume training periods. Further, changes in time spent in sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous activity in response to different training volumes were explored. Energy expenditure was measured in 15 male endurance athletes during 2 non-consecutive weeks - 1 week of high volume (>13 hours) training and another week of low volume (<7 hours) training. The SenseWear Pro 3 Armband, individual heart-rate-oxygen consumption regression and indirect calorimetry was used to measure non-exercise activity thermogensis (NEAT), exercise energy expenditure (EEE) and resting metabolic rate, respectively. Time spent at different intensities was assessed using previously established MET cutpoints. TDEE as well as EEE increased significantly with higher training volume, while no difference in NEAT occurred. Further, significantly less time was spent in sedentary activities during the high-volume week. These results suggest that highly trained athletes do not compensate for increased training volume and reduce sedentary activities to allow for more training time.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Athletes
  • Basal Metabolism
  • Calorimetry, Indirect
  • Energy Metabolism / physiology*
  • Exercise / physiology*
  • Heart Rate
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Oxygen Consumption
  • Physical Conditioning, Human / physiology*
  • Physical Endurance / physiology*
  • Physical Exertion / physiology*
  • Sports / physiology
  • Young Adult