Psychometric testing of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 6.2

Res Nurs Health. 2013 Oct;36(5):500-11. doi: 10.1002/nur.21554. Epub 2013 Jul 7.

Abstract

The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 6.2 (SCHFI v.6.2) is widely used, but its psychometric profile is still questioned. In a sample of 659 heart failure patients from Italy, we performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the original construct of the SCHFI v.6.2 scales (Self-Care Maintenance, Self-Care Management, and Self-Care Confidence), with limited success. We then used exploratory factor analysis to determine the presence of separate scale dimensions, followed by CFA in a separate sub-sample. Construct validity of individual scales showed excellent fit indices: CFI = .92, RMSEA = .05 for the Self-Care Maintenance Scale; CFI = .95, RMSEA = .07 for the Self-Care Management Scale; CFI = .99, RMSEA = .02 for the Self-Care Confidence scale. Contrasting groups validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were supported as well. This evidence provides a new understanding of the structure of the SCHFI v.6.2 and supports its use in clinical practice and research.

Keywords: heart failure; instrument validity and reliability; psychometric testing; self-care.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Factor Analysis, Statistical
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Heart Failure / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Italy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Psychometrics / instrumentation
  • Psychometrics / methods*
  • Psychometrics / standards
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self Care*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards*