[The bioethical principlism model applied in pain management]

Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2013 Mar;34(1):187-95. doi: 10.1590/s1983-14472013000100024.
[Article in Portuguese]

Abstract

An integrative literature review was developed with the purpose to analyze the scientific production regarding the relationships between pain and the principles of bioethics (autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence and justice). Controlled descriptors were used in three international data sources (LILACS, SciELO, MEDLINE), in April of 2012, totaling 14 publications categorized by pain and autonomy, pain and beneficence, pain and nonmaleficence, pain and justice. The adequate relief of pain is a human right and a moral issue directly related with the bioethical principlism standard model (beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice). However, many professionals overlook the pain of their patients, ignoring their ethical role when facing suffering. It was concluded that principlism has been neglected in the care of patients in pain, showing the need for new practices to change this setting.

MeSH terms

  • Analgesics / therapeutic use
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Beneficence
  • Bibliometrics
  • Bioethics*
  • Databases, Bibliographic
  • Drug Utilization
  • Humans
  • MEDLINE
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Morals
  • Narcotics / therapeutic use
  • Pain Management / ethics*
  • Pain Management / psychology
  • Pain Management / statistics & numerical data
  • Patient Rights
  • Personal Autonomy
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Principle-Based Ethics*
  • Professional-Patient Relations
  • Social Justice

Substances

  • Analgesics
  • Narcotics