Bacterial chemotaxis: introverted or extroverted? A comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of basic forms of metabolism-based and metabolism-independent behavior using a computational model

PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063617. Print 2013.

Abstract

Using a minimal model of metabolism, we examine the limitations of behavior that is (a) solely in response to environmental phenomena or (b) solely in response to metabolic dynamics, showing that basic forms of each of these kinds of behavior are incapable of driving survival-prolonging behavior in certain situations. Inspired by experimental evidence of concurrent metabolism-based and metabolism-independent chemotactic mechanisms in Escherichia coli and Rhodobacter sphaeroides, we then investigate how metabolism-independent and metabolism-based sensitivities can be integrated into a single behavioral response, demonstrating that a simple switching mechanism can be sufficient to effectively integrate metabolism-based and metabolism-independent behaviors. Finally, we use a spatial simulation of bacteria to show that the investigated forms of behavior produce different spatio-temporal patterns that are influenced by the metabolic-history of the bacteria. We suggest that these patterns could be a way to experimentally derive insight into the relationship between metabolism and chemotaxis in real bacteria.

MeSH terms

  • Chemotaxis / physiology*
  • Computer Simulation
  • Escherichia coli / metabolism*
  • Escherichia coli / physiology*
  • Models, Biological
  • Rhodobacter sphaeroides / metabolism*
  • Rhodobacter sphaeroides / physiology*

Grants and funding

MDE was employed as a Tutorial fellow at the University of Sussex, United Kingdom during the development of this manuscript. Thus there was no direct funding of the present article and no-one beside MDE had a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.