Gas phase measurements of the stabilization and solvation of metal dications in clusters of ammonia and methanol

J Phys Chem A. 2013 Jun 20;117(24):5015-22. doi: 10.1021/jp4014064. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

Abstract

An experimental study has been undertaken of the ability of small numbers of either ammonia or methanol molecules (XH) to form stable solvated complexes with each of nine metal dications, M(2+). Complexes have been generated using a combination of the pick-up technique and electron impact ionization, and individual ions were monitored for evidence of metastability in the form of Coulomb fission or charge separation: [M(XH)n](2+) → [M(+)X](XH)n-m + H2X(+)(XH)m-2. Values have been assigned to a quantity ns, which is identified as the minimum number of molecules required to suppress the above reaction. These values were found to range from 3 for Sr(2+) complexed with methanol to 19 for Sn(2+) complexed with ammonia. Comparisons are made with results published previously for the same metal dications complexed with water (Chen, X.; Stace, A. J. Chem. Commun.2012, 10292), and for the most part, it is found that ions solvated with either ammonia or methanol are less stable than their water counterparts. To account for differences in stability, several criteria have been examined, and of those, the most satisfactory correlation is between ns and M(2+)-XH bond strength; the stronger the bond, the larger ns has to be in order for a complex to be stable. However, for complexes where ns is large, such as those involving Zn(2+), Cu(2+), and especially Sn(2+) and Pb(2+), it is proposed that the geometry adopted by solvent molecules also has a significant influence on proton transfer. By comparing the ease with which proton transfer occurs for the three protic solvents, water, ammonia, and methanol, it is possible to comment on metal ion acidity in nonaqueous solutions, for which condensed phase data are nonexistent; the results suggest that most of the nine metals would be stronger Lewis acids in ammonia than in water.