[Transfusions in the acutely bleeding patient: the borders between too little too late and too much too early]

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(20):A6205.
[Article in Dutch]

Abstract

A restrictive regime regarding the initiation of blood transfusions was found to be safe in a Spanish study that included 921 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Survival after 6 weeks was higher (95 vs. 91%) in the restrictive group (Hb 4.3 mmol/l) than in the liberal group (Hb 5.6 mmol/l). The restrictive regimen was found favourable in patients with cirrhosis (class Child-Pugh A and B). In the Netherlands, guidelines prescribe the use of the 4-5-6 rule for initiating blood transfusions, depending on comorbidity (according to ASA classification) for patients who are haemodynamically stable and an aggressive regime when unstable. Starting blood transfusions can be lifesaving and must not be withheld in those who are haemodynamically unstable, but when stable, nuance is needed. In conclusion, the right balance needs to be found between too little too late and too much too early.

MeSH terms

  • Blood Transfusion*
  • Comorbidity
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / mortality
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Liver Cirrhosis / mortality
  • Male
  • Netherlands / epidemiology