A comparison of immunotherapy delivery methods for allergen immunotherapy

Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2013 May;9(5):465-74; quiz 475. doi: 10.1586/eci.13.25.

Abstract

Background: Allergic diseases are among the most common diseases in humans. Besides allergen avoidance, allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only causative treatment option. During recent years, many innovations of this therapy have emerged.

Methods: Selective literature research in Medline and PubMed, under the inclusion of national and international guidelines and Cochrane meta analyses.

Results: In several meta-analyses, the clinical efficacy of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) has been largely demonstrated. Recently, major research activities in mucosal immunotherapies focused on the sublingual application route. There are well-documented clinical data on the efficacy and safety of this form of immunotherapy. New application routes as well as new immune-modifying agents such as virus-like particles or CpG-motifs have also been investigated.

Conclusion: SIT is accepted to be the only causative treatment option for allergies. New application routes and new immune-modifying agents will allow for different delivery methods in the future.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Allergens / administration & dosage*
  • Allergens / immunology
  • Allergens / therapeutic use
  • Desensitization, Immunologic / methods*
  • Humans
  • Hypersensitivity / immunology
  • Hypersensitivity / therapy*
  • Injections, Subcutaneous
  • Sublingual Immunotherapy

Substances

  • Allergens