Efficacy and safety of infliximab as continuous or intermittent therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results of a randomized, long-term extension trial (RESTORE2)

Abstract

Background: Continuous maintenance therapy with infliximab 5 mg kg(-1) every 8 weeks is effective for moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous vs. intermittent infliximab maintenance therapy.

Methods: RESTORE2 was a long-term extension of RESTORE1. At baseline of RESTORE2, eligible patients who had received infliximab for 26 weeks and achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 in RESTORE1 were rerandomized 1 : 1 to continuous therapy (infliximab 5 mg kg(-1) every 8 weeks) or intermittent therapy (no infliximab until > 50% loss of PASI improvement). Safety and efficacy assessments occurred throughout the study.

Results: In total, 222 patients were randomized to receive continuous therapy, and 219 to intermittent therapy. More serious infusion-related reactions occurred with intermittent therapy (8/219 patients, 4%) than with continuous therapy (1/222 patients, < 1%), leading the sponsor to terminate the study. The mean duration of exposure to infliximab was 40·12 weeks (SD 27·55) with a mean of 5·8 infusions (range 0-16) for continuous therapy and 22·78 weeks (SD 22·98) with a mean of 3·4 infusions (range 0-16) for intermittent therapy. Although no formal efficacy analyses were conducted, continuous therapy led to greater PASI 75 at week 52 in the continuous group (81/101, 80%) than in the intermittent group (39/83, 47%); several other efficacy measures demonstrated similar patterns.

Conclusions: For patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis, continuous therapy with infliximab may be more effective than intermittent therapy. The incidence of serious infusion-related reactions in the intermittent group suggests that clinicians should avoid intermittent therapy in this population.