Split-dose administration of a dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser for colonoscopy: the SEE CLEAR I study

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul;78(1):132-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

Abstract

Background: New bowel cleansers for colonoscopy that lead to improved efficacy, safety, and tolerability are needed.

Objective: This study evaluated a nonphosphate, dual-action, low-volume, orange-flavored preparation containing sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate (P/MC).

Design: Multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized, noninferiority study.

Setting: University hospitals, academic medical centers, and private clinics across the United States.

Patients: Adults preparing for colonoscopy.

Interventions: P/MC versus 2 L of polyethylene glycol solution (2L PEG-3350) and two 5-mg bisacodyl tablets.

Main outcome measurements: This phase 3 study investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of split-dose administration of P/MC versus day-before dosing of 2L PEG-3350 and two 5-mg bisacodyl tablets (SEE CLEAR I study). Efficacy was evaluated by using the Aronchick and Ottawa scales; noninferiority and superiority analyses were performed. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs). Tolerability was measured via a patient questionnaire.

Results: The intent-to-treat population consisted of 601 patients who self-administered P/MC (n = 304) or 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets (n = 297). P/MC was superior to 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets in overall colon cleansing (84.2% vs 74.4%; 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 3.4) (Aronchick scores of excellent or good) and in cleansing of the ascending (89.5% vs 78.8%; 1-sided 97.5% CI, 4.9), mid (transverse and descending) (92.4% vs 85.9%; 1-sided 97.5% CI, 1.6), and rectosigmoid (92.4% vs 87.2%; 1-sided 97.5% CI, 0.4) segments of the colon (Ottawa scores of excellent, good, or fair). Commonly reported AEs related to the bowel preparations were nausea, vomiting, headache, and chills. Patient-reported tolerability, including ease of consumption and taste, was significantly higher for P/MC than 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets (P < .0001).

Limitations: Because of differences in administration and volume of the bowel preparations, the study was designed to be a single-assessor, blinded study.

Conclusions: The bowel-cleansing effects and patient acceptability of split-dose P/MC were superior to day-before dosing with 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bisacodyl / pharmacology*
  • Cathartics / pharmacology*
  • Citrates / pharmacology*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnesium Sulfate / pharmacology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Organometallic Compounds / pharmacology*
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Picolines / pharmacology*
  • Polyethylene Glycols / pharmacology*
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Tablets
  • Therapeutic Irrigation / methods
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Cathartics
  • Citrates
  • Organometallic Compounds
  • Picolines
  • Tablets
  • Bisacodyl
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • Magnesium Sulfate
  • picosulfate sodium