Aim: This article provides and reviews hypotheses to help explain the poorly understood phenomenon of delayed neurological injury following lightning or electrical injury.
Method: A review of extant literature provides a starting point to integrate what is already known in an attempt to provide new hypotheses for this phenomenon, as well as to discuss existing hypotheses.
Result: The author proposes two theories which stem from the literature on the damaging effects of oxidative stress, and also reviews an existing hypothesis, the electroporation hypothesis. The former two theories can account for delayed damage which is either of vascular or nonvascular origin. The electroporation hypothesis can explain changes both in cases where there is cellular loss as well as cases where there only appears to be change in function after lightning or electrical injury.
Conclusion: Although all theories discussed are speculative, the formation of hypotheses is always a starting point in the scientific process. In cases where there is delayed neurological damage with a vascular origin, it is possible that free radicals resulting from oxidative stress may gradually damage spinal vascular endothelial cells, cutting off blood supply, and ending in death of spinal neurons. When the delayed condition is demyelination without vascular damage, it is possible that the free radicals from oxidative stress are formed directly from the lipids found in abundance in myelin cells. The electroporation hypothesis, the formation of additional pores in neurons, may best explain immediate or progressive changes in structure and function after lightning or electrical injury.