Comparative study of PCL-HAp and PCL-bioglass composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013 May;24(5):1293-308. doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-4878-5. Epub 2013 Feb 17.

Abstract

The aim of this work is to compare the effect of hydroxyapatite (HAp) or bioglass (BG) nanoparticles in a polycaprolactone composite scaffold aimed to bone regeneration. To allow a comparison of the influence of both types of fillers, scaffolds made of PCL or composites containing up to 20 % by weight HAp or BG were obtained. Scaffolds showed acceptable mechanical properties for its use and high interconnected porosity apt for cellular colonization. To study the effect of the different materials on pre-osteoblast cells differentiation, samples with 5 % mineral reinforcement, were cultured for up to 28 days in osteogenic medium. Cells proliferated in all scaffolds. Nevertheless, differentiation levels for the selected markers were higher in pure PCL scaffolds than in the composites; inclusion of bioactive particles showed no positive effects on cell differentiation. In osteogenic culture conditions, the presence of bioactive particles is thus not necessary in order to observe good differentiation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bone and Bones* / cytology
  • Bone and Bones* / drug effects
  • Bone and Bones* / physiology
  • Cells, Cultured
  • Ceramics / chemical synthesis
  • Ceramics / chemistry*
  • Ceramics / pharmacology
  • Compressive Strength
  • Durapatite / chemistry*
  • Durapatite / pharmacology
  • Elastic Modulus
  • Materials Testing
  • Mice
  • Nanocomposites / chemistry
  • Osteoblasts / cytology
  • Osteoblasts / drug effects
  • Osteoblasts / physiology
  • Polyesters / chemistry*
  • Polyesters / pharmacology
  • Porosity
  • Tissue Engineering / instrumentation*
  • Tissue Scaffolds / chemistry*

Substances

  • Bioglass
  • Polyesters
  • polycaprolactone
  • Durapatite