Valved shunt as a treatment for obstructive uropathy: does pressure make a difference?

Pediatr Surg Int. 2013 Apr;29(4):381-6. doi: 10.1007/s00383-012-3249-5.

Abstract

Purpose: A valved ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (V-P shunt) as a vesico-amniotic shunt (V-A shunt) preserves the filling/emptying cycle and normal bladder development in fetal lambs with bladder outlet obstruction. The optimal pressure for such shunts is unknown.

Materials and methods: We created obstructive uropathy in 60-day gestation fetal lambs. A V-A shunt was placed 3 weeks later, using a low-pressure (Group L: 15-54 mmH2O) or a high-pressure (Group H: 95-150 mmH2O) V-P shunt. We included non-shunted (obstructive uropathy, Group O) and control lambs (Group C). All were delivered at 130 days. Bladder volumes, bladder thickness, renal and bladder histology were compared.

Results: Seventeen lambs had an obstructive uropathy created. Five Group L (four survived), four Group H (three survived) and five Group O survived. Body weight and crown-to-rump lengths of the three groups were not significantly different. Group H lambs had a dilated urachus, urinary ascites and severe ureteral dilatation similar to Group O lambs. There were four Group C lambs. Bladder volume was 10, 15 and 1,150 ml in Group H, 115 ± 67.9 ml in Group L, 128 ± 99.8 ml in Group O and 24.5 ± 3.84 ml in Group C. Unlike Group O lambs, Group L did not have urinary ascites, urinomas or renal dysplasia.

Conclusion: Low-pressure shunts preserved both bladder volume and renal development. High-pressure shunts did neither.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Dilatation, Pathologic
  • Female
  • Fetal Therapies*
  • Male
  • Pressure
  • Sheep
  • Urachus / pathology
  • Urinary Bladder / embryology
  • Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction / embryology
  • Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction / surgery*
  • Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt* / methods