Role of conventional chemosensitivity test and tissue biomarker expression in predicting response to treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colon cancer

Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2013 Jun;12(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2012.11.006. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

Abstract

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is observed in approximately 10% of patients with colorectal cancer at the time of primary cancer resection. Most of these patients receive 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)- or oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens as first-, second-, or third-line treatment. In the present study, sensitivity and resistance to drugs used to treat PC were better defined by a conventional chemosensitivity test than by biomarker expression.

Background: 5-Fluorouracil- or oxaliplatin-based regimens are the treatments of choice in patients with PC from colon cancer. There are currently no useful preclinical evaluations to guide the decision-making process for tailored therapy. The aim of the present study was to compare the advantages and limits of a conventional in vitro chemosensitivity test with those of a panel of biomolecular markers in predicting clinical response to different drugs used to treat colon cancer-derived PC.

Patients and methods: Fresh surgical biopsy specimens were obtained from 28 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colon cancer. TS, TP, DPD, MDR1, MRP-1, MGMT, BRCA1, ERCC1, GSTP1, and XPD gene expression levels were determined by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. An in vitro chemosensitivity test was used to define a sensitivity or resistance profile to the drugs used to treat each patient.

Results: Expression levels of the genes analyzed were generally poorly related to each other. TS and ERCC1 expression was inversely related to response to 5-FU-and/or oxaliplatin-containing regimens. Significant predictivity in terms of sensitivity but poor predictivity of resistance (56.2%) (P=.037) were observed for ERCC1 expression (90%), and high predictivity of resistance (100%) but very low predictivity of sensitivity (40%) (P=.014) were registered for TS. The best overall and significant predictivity was observed for chemosensitivity test results (62.5% sensitivity and 89% resistance; P=.005).

Conclusions: Sensitivity and resistance to drugs used in vivo was better defined by the chemosensitivity test than by biomarker expression.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / pharmacology*
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / genetics
  • Colonic Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Decision Making
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
  • Female
  • Fluorouracil / administration & dosage
  • Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Organoplatinum Compounds / administration & dosage
  • Oxaliplatin
  • Peritoneal Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Peritoneal Neoplasms / genetics
  • Peritoneal Neoplasms / secondary
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Organoplatinum Compounds
  • Oxaliplatin
  • Fluorouracil