Evaluation of ghost cell survival in the area of radiofrequency ablation

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e53158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053158. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

Abstract

Background and aim: Researchers have demonstrated dead cells in radiofrequency ablation (RFA) lesions that have morphological similarities to viable tumor cells and are thus referred to as ghost cells. However, studies on how long ghost cells persist have not been systematically performed.

Methods: A tumor model was established by implanting VX2 tumor tissue into the livers of 48 New Zealand rabbits. Two weeks later, these tumors were eliminated with RFA. The lesions were resected at 0 weeks, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, or 12 weeks after treatment, and samples were stained either with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH). The presence of the cells and the morphological changes that they underwent were examined by light microscopy.

Results: Four weeks after RFA, there were no obvious morphological changes observed in HE-stained ghost cells, and NADH staining revealed no viable cells. Eight weeks after RFA, the cell structure became indistinct. Twelve weeks after RFA, ghost cells were no longer present.

Conclusions: The morphological characteristics of ghost cells are maintained for at least 4 weeks, during which time HE staining cannot be used to differentiate ghost cells from residual tumor cells. NADH staining for cell viability is necessary to differentiate residual tumor cells from ghost cells. This evidence adds to our understanding of the mechanisms of RFA when used on solid tumors.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / pathology
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / radiotherapy*
  • Catheter Ablation*
  • Cell Survival*
  • Female
  • Male
  • Neoplasm Transplantation
  • Neoplasm, Residual / pathology
  • Rabbits

Grants and funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Natural Science Foundation from Chongqing City in China (CSTC, 2008BB5028). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.