Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):214-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318273bde4.

Abstract

Objective: To compare surgical outcomes and quality of life between single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) in patients with acute appendicitis.

Background: A prospective randomized single center study was performed to compare the outcome of SPLA and CLA in patients with acute appendicitis.

Methods: A total of 248 patients were randomized, but because of 18 withdrawals, the outcome of 224 is analyzed, 116 in CLA and 114 in SPLA.

Results: There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate (P = 0.470). There were no significant differences in infectious complications between the SPLA group and the CLA group (10.2% and 12.4%, respectively). The wound complication rate between the 2 groups was not significant (5.1% and 10.6%, respectively; P = 0.207). Cosmetic satisfaction score, 36-item short-form health survey, and postoperative pain scores were not significantly different between 2 groups.

Conclusions: SPLA failed to show any advantages over CLA relative to pain and cosmesis. However, SPLA is as safe as CLA (RCT number 01348464).

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Appendectomy / methods*
  • Appendicitis / surgery*
  • Female
  • Health Status Indicators
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain Measurement
  • Pain, Postoperative / epidemiology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult