Determination of the ideal preparation for colonoscopy in a rat model

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Dec;22(6):542-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318264c4f9.

Abstract

Background: Quality bowel preparation is essential to examine the entire colon adequately. No trials comparing different purgative regimens are available in animal models. The aim was to compare 5 methods for bowel cleansing to develop a rat model to study therapeutic colonoscopy.

Methods: Twenty-five rats were assigned to one of 5 regimens: (1) high-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (HV-PEG-ES, 40 mL); (2) low-volume PEG-ES (LV-PEG-ES, 20 mL); (3) high-volume PEG-ES+ascorbic acid (HV-PEG-ES+AA, 20 mL); (4) LV-PEG-ES+AA, 10 mL; (5) rectal enema with saline solution (RE-SS). Bowel preparation quality was rated by total colonoscopy.

Results: RE-SS is the best regime for left colon cleansing, whereas HV-PEG-ES and HV-PEG-ES+AA solutions resulted in significantly better cleansing in the whole colon. HV-PEG-ES+AA regimen needed less volume, and administration was easier.

Conclusions: A total of 20 mL of PEG-ES+AA before colonoscopy is the best regimen to explore the whole colon, whereas to explore the left colon RE-SS is adequate.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Ascorbic Acid / administration & dosage
  • Ascorbic Acid / pharmacology*
  • Cathartics / administration & dosage
  • Cathartics / pharmacology*
  • Colonoscopy / methods*
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Electrolytes / administration & dosage
  • Electrolytes / pharmacology*
  • Enema / methods
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal
  • Male
  • Polyethylene Glycols / administration & dosage
  • Polyethylene Glycols / pharmacology*
  • Random Allocation
  • Rats
  • Rats, Sprague-Dawley

Substances

  • Cathartics
  • Electrolytes
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • Ascorbic Acid