Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: where are we?

World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 14;18(38):5317-20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i38.5317.

Abstract

Peritoneal surface malignancies are generally associated with poor prognosis. In daily clinical routine, systemic chemotherapy is still considered the only reasonable therapy despite of encouraging results of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) along with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIPEC). The Achilles heel of CRS and HIPEC is appropriate patient selection and precise surgical technique preventing patients from excessive morbidity and mortality. Given these findings, new concepts of second look surgery for high risk patients allow detection of peritoneal spread ahead of clinical symptoms or presence of peritoneal masses reducing perioperative morbidity. In addition, personalized intraperitoneal chemotherapy might further improve outcome by appreciating individual tumor biology. These days, every physician should be aware of CRS and HIPEC for treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies. Since there is now sufficient data for the superiority of CRS and HIPEC to systemic chemotherapy in selected patients, our next goal should be providing this strategy with minimal morbidity and mortality even in the presence of higher tumor load.

Keywords: Cytoreductive surgery; Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; Peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Humans
  • Hyperthermia, Induced*
  • Peritoneal Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Peritoneum / surgery*
  • Reoperation

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents