Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;207(6):502.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.019. Epub 2012 Sep 22.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to examine the association of labor induction and perinatal outcomes.

Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women with term, live births. Women who had induction at a given gestational age (eg, 39 weeks) were compared to delivery at a later gestation (eg, 40, 41, or 42 weeks).

Results: Compared to delivery at a later gestational age, those induced at 39 weeks had a lower risk of cesarean (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.91) and labor dystocia (aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94). Their neonates had lowered risk of having 5-minute Apgar <7 (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92), meconium aspiration syndrome (aOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.48), and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97). Similar findings were seen for women who were induced at 40 weeks compared to delivery later.

Conclusion: Induction of labor in low-risk women at term is not associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery compared to delivery later.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cesarean Section / statistics & numerical data
  • Cohort Studies
  • Delivery, Obstetric / methods
  • Female
  • Gestational Age*
  • Humans
  • Labor, Induced*
  • Labor, Obstetric*
  • Odds Ratio
  • Parity
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications
  • Pregnancy Outcome*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Young Adult