Early versus delayed endoscopic surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: prospective randomized study

World Neurosurg. 2013 May-Jun;79(5-6):767-72. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of early versus delayed endoscopic surgery in patients with moderately severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Methods: The study included 100 patients with CTS. Investigations performed before surgery excluded secondary causes. Patients with moderately severe CTS (grade 3-4) were randomly assigned. Bland's neurophysiologic grading scale for CTS was used to assess the patients. Patients underwent an endoscopic carpal tunnel release using an indigenously designed instrument.

Results: Following a course of conservative treatment, surgical treatment was offered in two groups: early surgery (n = 51; <1 week after diagnosis) and delayed surgery as per the usual waiting list (n = 49; >6 months after diagnosis). Improvement in both groups was significant (P < 0.001). When both groups were compared, improvement was better for the early surgery group (P < 0.001; confidence interval 6.35-9.12).

Conclusions: On the basis of this study, early endoscopic surgery is proposed in patients with moderately severe CTS.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome / diagnosis
  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome / surgery*
  • Early Medical Intervention / methods*
  • Endoscopy / methods*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neurologic Examination
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Prospective Studies
  • Waiting Lists
  • Young Adult