The potential of aspen clonal forestry in Alberta: breeding regions and estimates of genetic gain from selection

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044303. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

Abstract

Background: Aspen naturally grows in large, single-species, even-aged stands that regenerate clonally after fire disturbance. This offers an opportunity for an intensive clonal forestry system that closely emulates the natural life history of the species. In this paper, we assess the potential of genetic tree improvement and clonal deployment to enhance the productivity of aspen forests in Alberta. We further investigate geographic patterns of genetic variation in aspen and infer forest management strategies under uncertain future climates.

Methodology/principal findings: Genetic variation among 242 clones from Alberta was evaluated in 13 common garden trials after 5-8 growing seasons in the field. Broad-sense heritabilities for height and diameter at breast height (DBH) ranged from 0.36 to 0.64, allowing 5-15% genetic gains in height and 9-34% genetic gains in DBH. Geographic partitioning of genetic variance revealed predominant latitudinal genetic differentiation. We further observed that northward movement of clones almost always resulted in increased growth relative to local planting material, while southward movement had a strong opposite effect.

Conclusion/significance: Aspen forests are an important natural resource in western Canada that is used for pulp and oriented strandboard production, accounting for ~40% of the total forest harvest. Moderate to high broad-sense heritabilities in growth traits suggest good potential for a genetic tree improvement program with aspen. Significant productivity gains appear possible through clonal selection from existing trials. We propose two breeding regions for Alberta, and suggest that well-tested southern clones may be used in the northern breeding region, accounting for a general warming trend observed over the last several decades in Alberta.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Alberta
  • Breeding*
  • Forestry
  • Genetic Variation
  • Phenotype
  • Phylogeny
  • Populus / genetics*
  • Populus / growth & development
  • Regression Analysis
  • Selection, Genetic*

Grants and funding

This study was supported by an NSERC/Industry Collaborative Development Grant CRDPJ 349100-06. Government funders included the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Alberta Forest Research Institute. Industry co-sponsors included Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc., Ainsworth Engineered Canada LP, Daishowa-Marubeni International Ltd., Western Boreal Aspen Corporation, and Weyerhaeuser Company Ltd. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of this manuscript.