Prospective randomized study of cefepime, panipenem, or meropenem monotherapy for patients with hematological disorders and febrile neutropenia

J Infect Chemother. 2013 Feb;19(1):103-11. doi: 10.1007/s10156-012-0466-8. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of carbapenems as initial treatment for febrile neutropenia (FN), and in patients unresponsive to this initial therapy, to evaluate the efficacy of subsequent treatment with aminoglycosides (AGs) or ciprofloxacin (CPFX). FN patients were randomized to receive cefepime (CFPM, control), panipenem/betamiprom (PAPM/BP), or meropenem (MEPM). Defervescence, an outcome endpoint, was evaluated 3 days later. Patients with minimal response were given CPFX or AGs, and their responses were reevaluated on day 7. A total of 255 patients were included. The efficacies of CFPM, PAPM/BP, and MEPM were comparable. In patients unresponsive to this initial therapy, the efficacy of subsequent CPFX and AGs treatments was also similar. There was no significant between-arm difference in cumulative efficacy on days 14 and 30. Adverse reactions were infrequent and mild. In conclusion, PAPM/BP and MEPM are as useful as CFPM as initial therapy for FN, and AGs are as efficacious as CPFX in patients unresponsive to the initial therapy.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Carbapenems / therapeutic use*
  • Cefepime
  • Cephalosporins / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Fever / drug therapy*
  • Hematologic Diseases / drug therapy*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Meropenem
  • Neutropenia / drug therapy*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Thienamycins / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Carbapenems
  • Cephalosporins
  • Thienamycins
  • Cefepime
  • Meropenem
  • panipenem