Aromatic systems contain both σ- and π-electrons, which in turn constitute σ- and π-molecular orbitals (MOs). In discussing the properties of these systems, researchers typically refer to the highest occupied and lowest unoccupied MOs, which are π MOs. The characteristic properties of aromatic systems, such as their low ionization potentials and electron affinities, high polarizabilities and stabilities, and small band gaps (in spectroscopy called the N → V1 space), can easily be explained based on their electronic structure. These one-electron properties point to characteristic features of how aromatic systems interact with each other. Unlike hydrogen bonding systems, which primarily interact through electrostatic forces, complexes containing aromatic systems, especially aromatic stacked pairs, are predominantly stabilized by dispersion attraction. The stabilization energy in the benzene dimer is rather small (~2.5 kcal/mol) but strengthens with heteroatom substitution. The stacked interaction of aromatic nucleic acid bases is greater than 10 kcal/mol, and for the most stable stacked pair, guanine and cytosine, it reaches approximately 17 kcal/mol. Although these values do not equal the planar H-bonded interactions of these bases (~29 kcal/mol), stacking in DNA is more frequent than H-bonding and, unlike H-bonding, is not significantly weakened when passing from the gas phase to a water environment. Consequently, the stacking of aromatic systems represents the leading stabilization energy contribution in biomacromolecules and in related nanosystems. Therefore stacking (dispersion) interactions predominantly determine the double helical structure of DNA, which underlies its storage and transfer of genetic information. Similarly, dispersion is the dominant contributor to attractive interactions involving aromatic amino acids within the hydrophobic core of a protein, which is critical for folding. Therefore, understanding the nature of aromatic interactions, which depend greatly on quantum mechanical (QM) calculations, is of key importance in biomolecular science. This Account shows that accurate binding energies for aromatic complexes should be based on computations made at the (estimated) CCSD(T)/complete basis set limit (CBS) level of theory. This method is the least computationally intensive one that can give accurate stabilization energies for all common classes of noncovalent interactions (aromatic-aromatic, H-bonding, ionic, halogen bonding, charge-transfer, etc.). These results allow for direct comparison of binding energies between different interaction types. Conclusions based on lower-level QM calculations should be considered with care.