Purpose of review: Although the conservative approach including Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy is considered as the first-line option in high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder tumors, cystectomy is often required as an alternative treatment in the case of BCG failure. Considering all the parameters, including clinical data, endoscopic aspects and new biological markers, the question of the indication, and moreover timing, of cystectomy has become crucial.
Recent findings: In fact, the real positive effect of BCG remains controversial and its actual benefit in terms of survival is not evident. Therefore, early cystectomy for this population with high risk of progression and metastasis diffusion is clearly a radical approach which can lead to a reduction in specific mortality. Recent articles have studied the parameters involved in this issue to determine the exact timing of cystectomy.
Summary: To avoid delay of appropriate treatment, it is crucial to determine the non-BCG responder population. Unfortunately, no consensual marker is currently available. Nevertheless, multifocal tumors, associated carcinoma in situ, prostatic urethral involvement, tumoral size greater than 3 cm and depth of infiltration are useful parameters in clinical practice to propose early cystectomy. In the future, the crucial question of cystectomy timing may be answered by progress in molecular signatures for bladder cancers.