The diagnostic performance of classical molecular tests used for detecting human papillomavirus

J Virol Methods. 2012 Oct;185(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.05.023. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

Abstract

Cervical samples were evaluated for human papillomavirus (HPV) presence using the hybrid capture-2 (HC2) assay and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with three different primer sets (GP5+/6+, MY09/11 and pU1M/2R). PCR results were compared to HC2 and results of all assays were compared to cytological and colposcopy findings. Post-test probability was assessed in individual assays and test combinations. HPV-DNA prevalence was 36.5% with HC2 and 55.2% with PCR. MY09/11 detected HPV-DNA in 38% of samples, GP5+/6+ in 19.1% and pU1M/2R in 16.4%. pU1M/2R and HC2 had the highest concordance (75.31%, k=0.39 in the whole population; 74.1%, k=0.5 in women with abnormal cytology). pU1M/2R had the best diagnostic performance, including optimal post-test probabilities and cervical abnormality detection (individually or in a panel of tests). Women positive for pU1M/2R may be at higher risk of disease progression; the assay performance when combined with a Pap smear in cervical cancer screening programs should be evaluated.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cervix Uteri / virology
  • Colposcopy / methods
  • Cytological Techniques / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / methods*
  • Nucleic Acid Hybridization / methods
  • Papillomaviridae / genetics
  • Papillomaviridae / isolation & purification*
  • Papillomavirus Infections / diagnosis*
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Prevalence
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Virology / methods*
  • Young Adult