Effects of randomizing phase on the discrimination between amplitude-modulated and quasi-frequency-modulated tones

Hear Res. 2012 Aug;290(1-2):72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.021. Epub 2012 May 17.

Abstract

This study investigated the bandwidth of phase sensitivity. Subjects discriminated amplitude-modulated tones (AM), and quasi-frequency-modulated tones (QFM) in a two-interval, forced-choice task. An adaptive threshold procedure was used to estimate the modulation depth needed to discriminate the stimuli as a function of carrier and modulation frequency. Non-monotonicities in threshold-bandwidth functions were often observed at higher modulation frequencies. The results are discussed in terms of two potential cues: (1) waveform envelope, (2) cubic distortion products. In order to degrade the information obtained from auditory distortions, the phase for the carrier frequency was randomly sampled from a uniform distribution, which diminished the non-monotonicities with minimal effect at lower modulation frequencies. Model simulations demonstrated that phase randomization degrades distortion product cues with only a modest effect on temporal cues. Final results show that maximum bandwidths for phase sensitivity (BW(max)) were not proportional to carrier frequencies.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Acoustic Stimulation
  • Adult
  • Audiometry
  • Auditory Pathways / physiology*
  • Auditory Threshold
  • Cues
  • Discrimination, Psychological*
  • Humans
  • Models, Biological
  • Pitch Discrimination*
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Random Allocation
  • Time Factors
  • Young Adult