Twenty five-gauge sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane surgery

J Med Invest. 2012;59(1-2):69-78. doi: 10.2152/jmi.59.69.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare visual outcomes, intraoperative and postoperative complications of 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy (25-G TSV) versus conventional 20-gauge vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery.

Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on 200 eyes with idiopathic ERM who underwent either primary 20-gauge vitrectomy (n=95) or 25-G TSV (n=105) with 6 months follow up. The following parameters were collected and compared: age, gender, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), postoperative anterior chamber inflammation, intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Results: Twenty-five gauge group achieved a significantly better vision at the 1(st) postoperative month (p=0.008) and a significantly higher incidence of visual improvement 6 months postoperatively (p=0.04) than 20-gauge group. Intraocular pressure was significantly higher at the 1(st), 3(rd) and 6(th) postoperative months compared with baseline in the 20-G group. However, in the 25-gauge group IOP remained near to the baseline at the same period. Twenty five-gauge group achieved a significantly lower anterior chamber inflammation and a lower incidence of postoperative cystoid macular edema (CME) (p=0.01), hyphema (p=0.000) and after cataract (p=0.000) than 20-gauge group.

Conclusions: The 25-gauge sutureless vitrectomy achieves rapid and higher visual improvement, less postoperative inflammation and complications than the 20-gauge vitrectomy in ERM surgery.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Epiretinal Membrane / surgery*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Intraoperative Complications / prevention & control
  • Male
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control
  • Suture Techniques*
  • Vitrectomy / instrumentation*
  • Vitrectomy / methods*