Comparing decision making between cancer patients and the general population: thoughts, emotions, or social influence?

J Health Commun. 2012;17(4):477-94. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.635774. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

Abstract

This study extends a risk information seeking and processing model to explore the relative effect of cognitive processing strategies, positive and negative emotions, and normative beliefs on individuals' decision making about potential health risks. Most previous research based on this theoretical framework has examined environmental risks. Applying this risk communication model to study health decision making presents an opportunity to explore theoretical boundaries of the model, while also bringing this research to bear on a pressing medical issue: low enrollment in clinical trials. Comparative analysis of data gathered from 2 telephone surveys of a representative national sample (n = 500) and a random sample of cancer patients (n = 411) indicated that emotions played a more substantive role in cancer patients' decisions to enroll in a potential trial, whereas cognitive processing strategies and normative beliefs had greater influences on the decisions of respondents from the national sample.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / methods
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / statistics & numerical data*
  • Decision Making*
  • Emotions
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Models, Psychological
  • Neoplasms / psychology*
  • Patient Selection*
  • Risk-Taking