[Comparison of three anti-aquaporin 4 antibody detection methods in neuromyelitis optical]

Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;50(10):848-50.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate three methods of detecting anti-aquaporin 4(AQP4) antibody in neuromyelitis optical(NMO), including indirect immunofluorescence assay organization (IIF), cell immunofluorescence method (CBA) and ELISA.

Methods: The patients were divided into NMO group (n = 29), multiple sclerosis (MS) group (n = 23), and healthy controls group (n = 50). IIF, CBA and ELISA were used in 3 groups to detect serum anti-AQP4 antibody. The sensitivity and specificity as well as the consistency of positive results were compared.

Results: In the aspect of the sensitivity of the three anti-AQP4 antibody to diagnosis NMO, CBA (72.4%) > IIF (62.1%) > ELISA (51.7%); in the aspect of specificity, CBA (100.0%) > ELISA (98.6%) > IIF (97.3%). Kappa testing and evaluation method showed that the three detection methods were all in good consistency, particular in CBA and ELISA (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: CBA method showed a highest specificity and sensitivity in all these three anti-AQP4 antibody detection methods. CBA and ELISA are in better consistency of positive results.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aquaporin 4 / immunology*
  • Autoantibodies / blood*
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Child
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
  • Female
  • Flow Cytometry
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin G / blood
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Sclerosis / immunology
  • Neuromyelitis Optica / blood
  • Neuromyelitis Optica / immunology*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • AQP4 protein, human
  • Aquaporin 4
  • Autoantibodies
  • Immunoglobulin G