Contraception and abortion coverage: What do primary care physicians think?

Contraception. 2012 Aug;86(2):153-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.11.069. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

Abstract

Background: Insurance coverage for family planning services has been a highly controversial element of the US health care reform debate. Whether primary care providers (PCPs) support public and private health insurance coverage for family planning services is unknown.

Study design: PCPs in three states were surveyed regarding their opinions on health plan coverage and tax dollar use for contraception and abortion services.

Results: Almost all PCPs supported health plan coverage for contraception (96%) and use of tax dollars to cover contraception for low-income women (94%). A smaller majority supported health plan coverage for abortions (61%) and use of tax dollars to cover abortions for low-income women (63%). In adjusted models, support of health plan coverage for abortions was associated with female gender and internal medicine specialty, and support of using tax dollars for abortions for low-income women was associated with older age and internal medicine specialty.

Conclusion: The majority of PCPs support health insurance coverage of contraception and abortion, as well as tax dollar subsidization of contraception and abortion services for low-income women.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Abortion, Legal / economics*
  • Age Factors
  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Contraception / economics*
  • Family Planning Services / economics*
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs*
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Humans
  • Insurance, Health, Reimbursement*
  • Internet
  • Male
  • Medical Assistance
  • National Health Insurance, United States
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Physicians, Primary Care / psychology*
  • Poverty
  • Pregnancy
  • Rhode Island
  • Sex Characteristics
  • United States