Comparison of experimental porous silicone implants and porous silicone implants

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;250(6):879-85. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1902-7. Epub 2011 Dec 28.

Abstract

Background: To investigate the extent and pattern of fibrovascular ingrowth of porous silicone sphere implants compared to porous polyethylene implants.

Methods: Experimental porous silicone sphere implants and porous polyethylene implants were implanted in the left socket of 20 New Zealand white rabbits after enucleation. Fibrovascular ingrowth and maturation was evaluated at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after implantation by histopathologic examination and scanning electron microscope.

Results: At 4 weeks after surgery, porous polyethylene implants showed deeper fibrovascular ingrowth than porous silicone sphere implants; 42.4% versus 34.2% of radius of the implants respectively (p = 0.047). However there was no significant difference in the depth of fibrovascular ingrowth between the two groups at 8 weeks after implantation, although porous polyethylene implants showed deeper fibrovascular ingrowth than porous silicone sphere implants; 71.6% versus 63.6% (p = 0.102).

Conclusions: Porous silicone orbital implants demonstrated a comparable extent of fibrovascular ingrowth to that for porous polyethylene implants. Therefore, this new porous silicone sphere implant may be a good candidate to substitute for current porous implants at a lower cost.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biocompatible Materials*
  • Eye Enucleation
  • Female
  • Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
  • Neovascularization, Physiologic / physiology
  • Oculomotor Muscles / ultrastructure
  • Orbit / surgery*
  • Orbital Implants*
  • Polyethylenes*
  • Porosity
  • Prosthesis Implantation*
  • Rabbits
  • Silicone Elastomers*

Substances

  • Biocompatible Materials
  • Medpor
  • Polyethylenes
  • Silicone Elastomers