Different guidelines for different countries? On the scientific basis of low-risk drinking guidelines and their implications

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012 Mar;31(2):156-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00395.x. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

Abstract

The scientific evidence for low-risk drinking guidelines was examined in a narrative review focusing on three points: definition of exposure, the best way to select outcomes and risk relations and how to determine thresholds. With respect to exposure, at least two dimensions should be incorporated: average volume of alcohol consumption and patterns of irregular heavy drinking occasions. Mortality should be selected as the most severe outcome, and a disaggregated approach should be adopted incorporating the regional demographic and cause of death structure. Finally, our plea is for establishing a general threshold for acceptable risk on a societal level rather than ad hoc specific committees setting norms for specific risks. Acceptable thresholds will be different if the risk is to oneself or to others.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Alcohol Drinking / adverse effects
  • Alcohol Drinking / mortality*
  • Alcohol-Related Disorders / prevention & control*
  • Guidelines as Topic*
  • Humans
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Risk
  • Terminology as Topic