Background: In endovascular recanalisation of infrapopliteal arteries, studies have already pointed out the value of balloon angioplasty, but for stent implantation very few randomized controlled data exist so far.
Patients and methods: We conducted a randomized controlled prospective trial in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) comparing the effect of percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) versus primary stenting in infrapopliteal arteries, concerning 1-year clinical benefit and reobstruction rate.
Results: 54 patients were either randomized for primary stenting (balloon expandable stent) or PTA alone, 33 patients were assigned to the PTA group, 21 patients to the stent group. The whole follow up period of 12 months was completed by 46 patients. Improvement by at least one Rutherford classification was reached by a total of 33 (75.0 %) of patients at month 12, 22 (81.5 %) in the PTA group and 11 (64.7 %) in the stent group. A complete ulcer healing at month 12 showed 21 (63.6 %) of all patients, with a higher percentage in patients treated with PTA alone 16 (80.0 %) vs 5 (38.5 %). 50.0 % of all patients showed re-obstruction over the follow-up period, 39.4 % of the PTA and 66.7 % of the stent group. At month 3 primary patency rate was nearly equal in both groups (76.7 % PTA vs 75.0 % stent), but drifted apart with the duration of the follow-up period, with a primary patency at month 12 in the PTA group of 48,1 % vs 35,3 % in the stent group. As for secondary patency at month 12 the PTA group showed a patency rate of 70.4 %, vs 52.9 % in the stent group.
Conclusions: Primary stenting with balloon expandable stents in the infrapopliteal arteries does not outway the benefit of PTA alone with the application of modern hydrophilic balloon catheters in patients with CLI.