[Comparative study of direct cost between open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy]

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2011 Jul-Aug;49(4):353-60.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Objective: to compare the direct cost of open cholecystectomy (OCL) with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCL), using a microcosting approach.

Methods: in patients who underwent cholecystectomy (C) in the Hospital General de Mexico, we collected patient age and sex, time in the operative room (OR), anesthesia and surgical procedure; health personal (HP) involved; materials (M) and medications consumed; medical instruments (MI) and medical equipment (ME) used.

Results: there were 355 patients operated by C, were 248 included, 94 with CAB and 74 with CLP. CAB surgical time was longer than CLP (102 versus 82, p<0.00.1); CLP had a higher use of materials intraoperative ($5 329 versus $1 403, p<0.001). There are no differences in: cost for HP, MI and ME. The total direct cost was $7238 (US$615) for CAB and $12 507 (US$1 063) for CLP (p <0.001) at 11.76 Mexican pesos per dollar.

Conclusions: the difference in costs between OCL and LCL is primarily explained by the cost of lab exams which represent 79% of the M cost for CLP.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cholecystectomy / economics*
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / economics*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Direct Service Costs
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male