Does screening high school students for psychological distress, deliberate self-harm, or suicidal ideation cause distress--and is it acceptable? An Australian-based study

Crisis. 2011;32(5):254-63. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000087.

Abstract

Background: Programs designed to detect students at risk of depression and suicidality have shown success (Shaffer et al., 2004).

Aims: The current study sought to examine whether or not such a program was acceptable to participants and whether or not it caused distress.

Methods: Participants were boys aged 14 to 16. Participants were assessed using an on-line questionnaire; acceptability was measured via postal questionnaire.

Results: Of 272 participants, 31 (11.4%) were considered at-risk; 13 required ongoing support, 8 of whom had not previously sought help. Overall screening did not appear to cause significant undue distress, although some differences were evident between at-risk and not at-risk students. All participants found the program acceptable.

Conclusions: When conducted carefully, early detection programs can be an effective and acceptable method of identifying at-risk adolescents.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Depression / diagnosis
  • Depression / psychology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Screening / adverse effects
  • Mass Screening / psychology*
  • Risk Factors
  • Self-Injurious Behavior / diagnosis*
  • Self-Injurious Behavior / psychology
  • Stress, Psychological / diagnosis*
  • Stress, Psychological / etiology
  • Stress, Psychological / psychology
  • Students / psychology
  • Suicidal Ideation*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Victoria / epidemiology