Evidence-based risk recommendations for best practices in the training of qualified exercise professionals working with clinical populations

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul:36 Suppl 1:S232-65. doi: 10.1139/h11-054.

Abstract

This systematic review examines critically "best practices" in the training of qualified exercise professionals. Particular attention is given to the core competencies and educational requirements needed for working with clinical populations. Relevant information was obtained by a systematic search of 6 electronic databases, cross-referencing, and through the authors' knowledge of the area. The level and grade of the available evidence was established. A total of 52 articles relating to best practices and (or) core competencies in clinical exercise physiology met our eligibility criteria. Overall, current literature supports the need for qualified exercise professionals to possess advanced certification and education in the exercise sciences, particularly when dealing with "at-risk" populations. Current literature also substantiates the safety and effectiveness of exercise physiologist supervised stress testing and training in clinical populations.

Publication types

  • Practice Guideline
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Allied Health Personnel / education*
  • Allied Health Personnel / standards
  • Benchmarking
  • Clinical Competence
  • Consensus
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Decision Trees
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Exercise Therapy / adverse effects
  • Exercise Therapy / education*
  • Exercise Therapy / standards
  • Health Status Indicators*
  • Health Status*
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening / methods*
  • Mass Screening / standards
  • Motor Activity*
  • Physical Fitness*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires* / standards