Urinary incontinence self-report questions: reproducibility and agreement with bladder diary

Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Dec;22(12):1565-71. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1503-3. Epub 2011 Jul 28.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: This study aims to measure self-report urinary incontinence questions' reproducibility and agreement with bladder diary.

Methods: Data were analyzed from the Reproductive Risk of Incontinence Study at Kaiser. Participating women reporting at least weekly incontinence completed self-report incontinence questions and a 7-day bladder diary. Self-report question reproducibility was assessed and agreement between self-reported and diary-recorded voiding and incontinence frequency was measured. Test characteristics and area under the curve were calculated for self-reported incontinence types using diary as the gold standard.

Results: Five hundred ninety-one women were included and 425 completed a diary. The self-report questions had moderate reproducibility and self-reported and diary-recorded incontinence and voiding frequencies had moderate to good agreement. Self-reported incontinence types identified stress and urgency incontinence more accurately than mixed incontinence.

Conclusions: Self-report incontinence questions have moderate reproducibility and agreement with diary, and considering their minimal burden, are acceptable research tools in epidemiologic studies.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Medical Records*
  • Middle Aged
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self Report*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*
  • Time Factors
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / classification
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / epidemiology*
  • Urinary Incontinence, Urge / classification
  • Urinary Incontinence, Urge / epidemiology*