Is it necessary to penalize impulsive noise +5 dB due to higher risk of hearing damage?

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):3808-17. doi: 10.1121/1.3573981.

Abstract

It is studied whether the +5 dB penalty for impulsiveness established by ISO 1999:1990 accounts for a higher risk of noise-induced hearing loss. A total of 16 normal-hearing human subjects were exposed for 10 min to two types of binaural industrial-recordings: (1) a continuous broad-band noise normalized to L(EX,8 h)=80 dBA and (2) the combination of the previous stimulus with an impulsive noise normalized to L(EX,8 h)=75+5(db penalty)=80 dBA (peak level 117 dBC and repetition rate of 0.5 impacts per second). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured in a broad frequency range before and in the following 90 min after the exposure. The group results show that the continuous exposure had a bigger impact on DPOAE levels, with a maximum DPOAE shift of approximately 5 dB in the frequency range of 2-3.15 kHz during the first 10 min of the recovery. No evident DPOAE shift is seen for the impulsive + continuous stimulus. The results indicate that the penalty overestimated the effects on DPOAE levels and support the concept that the risk of hearing loss from low-level impulses may be predicted on an equal-energy basis.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acoustic Impedance Tests
  • Acoustic Stimulation
  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Audiometry, Pure-Tone
  • Auditory Threshold
  • Denmark
  • Environmental Monitoring / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Female
  • Health Policy
  • Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced / etiology*
  • Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced / physiopathology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Noise, Occupational / adverse effects*
  • Noise, Occupational / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Occupational Health* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Sex Factors
  • Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Sound Spectrography
  • Time Factors
  • Young Adult