Science and society: some "made-in-Canada" options for improving integration

Account Res. 2011 May;18(3):194-216. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.575246.

Abstract

In this article, the authors describe relatively recent efforts by scientific research agencies to promote, through various funding programs, the integration of social sciences and humanities with the natural sciences. This "integrated" approach seeks to study science through a broader interdisciplinary lens in order to better anticipate, understand, and address its ethical, legal, and social implications. The authors review the origins and evolution of this trend, as well the arguments which have been formulated by both proponents and critics of integration. By using Genome Canada's "GE(3)LS" Research Program as a case study, the authors discuss the successes and continuing challenges of this model based on evaluation results available to date. The authors then go on to examine and compare three possible models for improving the future success of the GE(3)LS research program, including: 1) enhancing the current integrated research approach through incremental refinements based on concrete evidence and lessons learned; 2) promoting greater interaction and synergy across GE(3)LS research projects through a deliberate, systematic and coordinated "hub and spoke" approach; and 3) taking a broad programmatic approach to GE(3)LS research by creating a central resource of available expertise and advisory capacity.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Canada
  • Communication
  • Delivery of Health Care, Integrated*
  • Female
  • Genetic Research
  • Human Genome Project / organization & administration*
  • Humans
  • Interprofessional Relations
  • Male
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Quality Improvement
  • Research Design
  • Science*
  • Societies*