Differential diagnosis between fibroadenoma, giant fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour: sonographic features and core needle biopsy

Radiol Med. 2011 Sep;116(6):905-18. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0672-y. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
[Article in English, Italian]

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyse mammographic and ultrasound (US) features of fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour and assess the diagnostic accuracy of mammography, US and US-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) in the differential diagnosis of these two lesions.

Materials and methods: The results of the pathological analysis of excision biopsy of 83 lesions (67 fibroadenomas and 16 phyllodes tumours) were correlated with the findings of mammography, US and US-guided CNB performed on 83 women with a mean age of 45.4 years (range 18-75 years).

Results: Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values compared with histology were 45%, 50% and 79% for mammography, 34%, 69% and 82% for US and 81%, 97% and 87% for US-guided CNB (p=0.001).

Conclusions: The almost complete overlap between mammographic and US parameters of fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumours and the absence of pathognomonic features preclude the differential diagnosis between the two histological types. US-guided CNB is a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis between fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Biopsy, Needle / methods*
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Fibroadenoma / diagnostic imaging*
  • Humans
  • Mammography
  • Middle Aged
  • Phyllodes Tumor / diagnostic imaging*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional
  • Ultrasonography, Mammary