Objective/hypothesis: The purpose of the study was to assess the satisfaction and quality of life in laryngectomees after vocal rehabilitation using voice prostheses. We evaluated the impact on quality of life between laryngectomees with voice prostheses, laryngectomees without them and healthy controls.
Methods: This was a prospective study on a sample of laryngectomees in an Italian university hospital. Our study population was composed of 42 patients who had previously undergone a total laryngectomy; in 24 of them, voice rehabilitation was obtained with a voice prosthesis device (group A), while 18 of them learned oesophageal voice (group B). The results were compared with a group of 25 healthy controls (group C). In order to investigate the quality of life, we administered the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) to the 3 groups. Moreover, self-satisfaction of the subjects in group A was assessed by single questions regarding their use of the voice prosthesis.
Results: A statistical difference in the SF-36 was detected for social functioning (SF) between groups A and B. Role physical, SF and role emotional were significantly better in group C than in group A. Group A stated they were very satisfied with voice quality while there were still some problems regarding prosthesis lifetime and communication at the telephone or in noisy environments.
Conclusions: Voice prosthesis implantation in laryngectomees showed positive effects on patients' quality of life; however, there are still some negative aspects. At present, an early diagnosis of larynx cancer with a partial laryngectomy in order to preserve phonatory function is the gold standard.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.