[Review of urban nonpoint source pollution models]

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2010 Oct;31(10):2532-40.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

The development history of urban nonpoint source pollution models is reviewed. Features, applicability and limitations of seven popular urban nonpoint source pollution models (SWMM, STORM, SLAMM, HSPF, DR3M-QUAL, MOUSE, and HydroWorks) are discussed. The methodology and research findings of uncertainty in urban nonpoint source pollution modeling are presented. Analytical probabilistic models for estimation of urban nonpoint sources are also presented. The research achievements of urban nonpoint source pollution models in China are summarized. The shortcomings and gaps of approaches on urban nonpoint source pollution models are pointed out. Improvements in modeling of pollutants buildup and washoff, sediments and pollutants transport, and pollutants biochemical reactions are desired for those seven popular models. Most of the models developed by researchers in China are empirical models, so that they can only applied for specific small areas and have inadequate accuracy. Future approaches include improving capability in fate and transport simulation of sediments and pollutants, exploring methodologies of modeling urban nonpoint source pollution in regions with little data or incomplete information, developing stochastic models for urban nonpoint source pollution simulation, and applying GIS to facilitate urban nonpoint source pollution simulation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cities
  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Geographic Information Systems
  • Models, Theoretical*
  • Rain*
  • Water Movements*
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical / analysis*
  • Water Pollution / analysis
  • Water Pollution / prevention & control*

Substances

  • Water Pollutants, Chemical