Objective: The use of didanosine (ddI) in first-line antiretroviral therapy has been recently promoted for resource-limited settings. We therefore compared the long-term effectiveness and safety of the regimen combining ddI, lamivudine, and efavirenz or nevirapine with that of the WHO-recommended regimen of zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine, and efavirenz or nevirapine in antiretroviral-naïve patients in Senegal.
Methods: Observational cohort study of patients enrolled between January 2000 and April 2002 in the Senegalese antiretroviral drug access initiative. Multivariate analyses were performed to compare, between the ddI and ZDV groups, the proportion of patients with a viral load <500 copies/ml during follow-up; the increase in the CD4 cell count; survival; treatment changes and severe adverse events.
Results: Of 151 patients, 71 received the ddI-based treatment and 80 received the ZDV-based treatment. Throughout follow-up, 80-95% of patients had a viral load below 500 copies/ml in both the ddI and ZDV groups (P = 0.5). The CD4 cell count increased after treatment initiation from 176 to 497 cells/mm(3) in the ddI group and from 176 to 567 cells/mm(3) in the ZDV group (P > 0.3). The rate of death tended to be higher in the ddI group (P = 0.06). ddI was less commonly discontinued than ZDV (P = 0.03).
Conclusion: The combination of ddI, lamivudine, and efavirenz or nevirapine resulted in sustained viral suppression and immunological recovery.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.