Background: In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), catheter ablation maintains sinus rhythm more effectively than antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), but its effect on symptoms and quality of life (QOL) has not been fully characterized.
Methods and results: We evaluated symptoms and QOL in a multicenter, randomized trial comparing catheter ablation with AADs as second-line treatment for patients with paroxysmal AF. The Short Form (SF)-36 health survey and the AF Symptom Checklist were administered at baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months after a blanking or dose-titration period. The primary between-group comparisons were conducted at 3 months because of permitted crossover from AAD to ablation beyond this time. Additional analyses based on subsequent follow-up were performed, including the construction of mixed linear regression models to assess the impact of multiple factors on follow-up QOL scores. At baseline in both the ablation (n=103) and the AAD (n=56) groups, 7 of 8 SF-36 scales were well below population norms, as were the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) summary scores. At 3 months, the same 7 SF-36 scales were significantly (P<0.01) higher in the ablation than in the AAD group, as were the PCS (52.0±7.8 versus 47.1±10.6; P<0.01) and MCS (52.4±8.1 versus 46.6±9.8; P<0.01) scores, whereas symptom frequency (9.3±9.2 versus 19.0±12.6; P<0.001) and symptom severity (7.7±7.2 versus 16.2±10.0; P<0.001) were significantly reduced. In multivariable analysis, ablation and recurrent arrhythmias most strongly correlated with QOL changes over time.
Conclusions: For second-line therapy of paroxysmal AF, ablation is superior to AAD treatment at improving symptoms and QOL.
Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00116428.