Evaluation of inter-session 3D-TRUS to 3D-TRUS image registration for repeat prostate biopsies

Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2010;13(Pt 2):17-25. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15745-5_3.

Abstract

To ensure accurate targeting and repeatability, 3D TRUS-guided biopsies require registration to determine coordinate transformations to (1) incorporate pre-procedure biopsy plans and (2) compensate for inter-session prostate motion and deformation between repeat biopsy sessions. We evaluated prostate surface- and image-based 3D-to-3D TRUS registration by measuring the TRE of manually marked, corresponding, intrinsic fiducials in the whole gland and peripheral zone, and also evaluated the error anisotropy. The image-based rigid and non-rigid methods yielded the best results with mean TREs of 2.26 mm and 1.96 mm, respectively. These results compare favorably with a clinical need for an error of less than 2.5 mm.

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Biopsy / methods*
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / methods
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Male
  • Prostate / diagnostic imaging*
  • Prostate / pathology*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Subtraction Technique*
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Ultrasonography / methods*
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional / methods*