[Acute hepatitis, but not A, B, or C: consider E]

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010:154:A1865.
[Article in Dutch]

Abstract

Objective: To determine the percentage of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections in serum samples from patients with negative serology for hepatitis A, B and C and to find out what may be the harmful consequences of a missed diagnosis of acute HEV infection.

Design: Retrospective study.

Method: Serum samples were selected from patients with infectious hepatitis who tested negative for hepatitis A, B and C virus. Serum samples that had elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT; > 34 U/l) were included in this study. All samples were then tested for HEV using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoblot assay. Of patients with serological evidence of acute HEV, files were checked for the originally documented diagnosis at hospital discharge.

Results: In the period October 2007-September 2008, 139 serum samples met the inclusion criteria. In 23 serum samples the ELISA was positive (IgM positive and/or Ig total positive); in 16/23 serum samples immunoblot assay was also positive. The percentage of confirmed HEV infections was 11.5% (16/139). In only one patient was the originally documented diagnosis correct. Several patients underwent invasive diagnostic procedures and treatment as a result of an incorrect diagnosis.

Conclusion: Hepatitis E serology should be a standard tool in the diagnostic workup of infectious hepatitis patients in the Netherlands.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
  • Female
  • Hepatitis Antibodies / blood*
  • Hepatitis E / blood
  • Hepatitis E / diagnosis*
  • Hepatitis E virus / immunology*
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Liver / enzymology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Hepatitis Antibodies