[Drug-eluting stents: do we respect the on-label use in our daily practice?]

Abstract

Drug-eluting stents (DES) are known to dramatically reduce restenosis. However, they are more expansive than bare-metal stents (BMS) and they require prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. In France, the French Society of Cardiology and the "Haute Autorité de santé" have defined recommendations for the use of DES (restricted to patients in high-risk group). The aim of this work was to evaluate our practice (whether these recommendations were well respected or not in our center). Between November 2007 and January 2008 then November 2008 and January 2009 we evaluated all Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI). Two hundred and sixteen (216) patients (mean age 65 ± 13 years, 164 (76 %) were males and, 41 (19 %) were diabetics) had a PCI for stable angina or silent ischemia (47 %), unstable angina or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) ST- (26 %), ACS ST+<48 hours (24 %) or ACS ST+>48 hours-1 month (3 %). Two hundred and seventy six (276) stents were used, including 35 % of DES. The recommendations were well respected in 82 % of cases. However, 27 % of BMS were implanted in patients in whom DES were indicated. The French recommendations for DES are a reference to help practitioners, but they require to be adapted to each patient, depending on clinical state and their ability to be treated with prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy.