Internal migration effectiveness and income effectiveness in the most populous cities in the United States

Popul Rev. 2010;49(2):n/a. doi: 10.1353/prv.0.0023.

Abstract

In this study, migration data compiled by the Internal Revenue Serve (IRS) and the US Census Bureau for 2006-07 were used to analyse internal migration patterns using migration and income effectiveness for the counties containing the 25 most populous cities in the United States. The results indicated that both large metropolitan and rural counties have lost population and income due to migration. Small metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties closer to cities gained population and income. Counties in South Florida attracted a large number of higher-income migrants from the largest cities in the US. In the last 13 years, New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, the three most populous cities in the US, had negative migration effectiveness. Suburban areas and second-tier cities continued to attract people from large metropolitan areas.

Publication types

  • Historical Article

MeSH terms

  • Censuses* / history
  • Cities* / economics
  • Cities* / ethnology
  • Cities* / history
  • Cities* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Demography
  • Government Agencies / economics
  • Government Agencies / history
  • Government Agencies / legislation & jurisprudence
  • History, 20th Century
  • History, 21st Century
  • Income / history
  • Population Density*
  • Population Dynamics*
  • Social Mobility / economics
  • Social Mobility / history
  • Socioeconomic Factors*
  • United States / ethnology