Evaluation of three methodologies to estimate the VO2max in people of different ages

Appl Ergon. 2010 Dec;42(1):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.06.017. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

Abstract

Aging and gender are factors that affect the variation of physical work capacity. The present paper highlights the importance of the metabolism used by ergonomics to establish the appropriate limits of loads at work. This study compares the aerobic capacity of people from 20 to 71 years old split in 5 different groups. The laboratory experiment tested 33 volunteers (19 women and 14 men). A submaximal step test was used to measure the VO(2) using a portable breath by breath metabolic system and a telemetric heart rate monitor. Three methods to estimate the VO(2max) were compared: 1) a direct measurement of VO(2), 2) estimation by heart rate, and 3) a step test method using predetermined charts. Significant difference was encountered among the estimation methods as well as among the age ranges (F(2,92)=6.43, p<0.05 y F(4,92)=7.18, p<0.05 respectively). The method of direct measurement and the method of predetermined charts were different for the estimation of the VO(2max) with a confidence level of 95%. The method of predetermined charts is better adapted for males and people younger than 30 years. The estimation through non invasive heart rate apparatus was a good appraiser of the maximal oxygen consumption considering both genders and all the age groups.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Basal Metabolism*
  • Ergonomics
  • Exercise Test
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Oxygen Consumption / physiology*
  • Physical Exertion / physiology
  • Telemetry
  • Workload
  • Young Adult