Design and testing of foods differing in protein to energy ratios

Appetite. 2010 Oct;55(2):367-70. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jun 19.

Abstract

Our aim was to design a selection of foods with differing proportions of protein but equal palatability in two settings, Sydney Australia and Kingston Jamaica. The foods were manipulated to contain 10, 15 or 25% E as protein with reciprocal changes in carbohydrate to 60, 55 or 45% E and dietary fat was kept constant at 30%. Naïve participants did not identify a difference in protein between the versions. On average, the versions were rated equal in pleasantness (Sydney-10%: 44±2, 15%: 49±2 and 25%: 49±2 Kingston-10%: 41±3, 15%: 41±3 and 25%: 37±3).

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Australia
  • Cultural Diversity*
  • Dietary Carbohydrates / metabolism
  • Dietary Fats / metabolism
  • Dietary Proteins / administration & dosage*
  • Dietary Proteins / metabolism*
  • Eating*
  • Energy Intake*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Jamaica
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Dietary Carbohydrates
  • Dietary Fats
  • Dietary Proteins