Difference between random and imprinted X inactivation in common voles

Chromosoma. 2010 Oct;119(5):541-52. doi: 10.1007/s00412-010-0277-6. Epub 2010 May 15.

Abstract

During early development in female mammals, most genes on one of the two X-chromosomes undergo transcriptional silencing. In the extraembryonic lineages of some eutherian species, imprinted X-inactivation of the paternal X-chromosome occurs. In the cells of the embryo proper, the choice of the future inactive X-chromosome is random. We mapped several genes on the X-chromosomes of five common vole species and compared their expression and methylation patterns in somatic and extraembryonic tissues, where random and imprinted X-inactivation occurs, respectively. In extraembryonic tissues, more genes were expressed on the inactive X-chromosome than in somatic tissues. We also found that the methylation status of the X-linked genes was always in accordance with their expression pattern in somatic, but not in extraembryonic tissues. The data provide new evidence that imprinted X-inactivation is less complete and/or stable than the random form and DNA methylation contributes less to its maintenance.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Arvicolinae / genetics*
  • Chromosome Mapping
  • DNA Methylation*
  • Female
  • Gene Expression*
  • Genes, X-Linked
  • Genomic Imprinting*
  • Humans
  • In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
  • Male
  • Muridae
  • RNA, Long Noncoding
  • RNA, Untranslated / genetics
  • Repressor Proteins
  • X Chromosome / genetics
  • X Chromosome / metabolism
  • X Chromosome Inactivation*

Substances

  • RNA, Long Noncoding
  • RNA, Untranslated
  • Repressor Proteins
  • XIST non-coding RNA